How Canadian Literature can lead one to ponder...
ENG356H1. A course code among so many others, but Topics in Canadian literature: Literary Montreal really grabbed me by the throat yesterday. At the moment we are reading and discussing Stephen Leacock's Arcadian Adventures of the Idle Rich, a story set in Chicago (but you have to imagine it's Montreal. That's how modern literature works, or so I have been told.) about the 'happy few', the 'square milers', the 'new money', the very rich. The book is one big satire on a class that is idle, immensely corrupt, naive and extremely wealthy. Leacock satirizes this class - curious thing to know is that he worked himself up and managed to belong to the 'idle rich' himself - all through the 200 pages, no alternative presented, no redemption, no building up, only towing down. Around page 150 I started wondering whether he was actually going to propose a solution to the corruption and power of money, but as the question crossed my mind, I felt incredibly naive. Of course he was not going to present me with a perfect solution, of course there was not going to be a happy last line to the novel, this is just how this social class works apparently. That was more or less how I felt when finishing the book. When I got to the class things got clearer. Professor O'Connor encourages - read: gently forces - us to give our own opinion on the book in order to start the discussion (this is what we do during the first of the 3-hour lecture!). As I heard the different interpretations and thoughts of my fellow students, I realised that I was not the only one looking for a positive note amoung the bitterness. And then there was this one comment of a girl sitting in the second row:
' Professor, why didn't Leacock bring a middle class family into the story, in order to contrast their 'virtue' with the 'vice' of the idle rich?'
And Prof. O'Connor replied: 'Dear X (here he said the girl's name, he knows us all by name, unfortunately I can't remember hers), maybe there is no such thing as 'virtue'. Maybe Leacock didn't bring another class into the story because maybe, middle class members are just as corrupt, idle and vicious as the idle rich. I want each and every one of you to think about this. Look at yourselves, are you not part of 'the idle rich'? Are our politicians not corrupt? Is our system not characterised by inefficiency and an enormous waste of money and time?'
And all went silent... We all read the book and I think we all read it as a satire on the really well-off people, the ones who own yachts and summer houses, the ones who play golf and drive Bentley's, but I don't think any of us thought about their own 'class', none of us even considered looking at their own situation... At first there was a long silence and then someone just asked another question and the discussion went on, but as for me, I was really taken aback by what had just occured in the 405 classroom in Carr Hall.
After the 3-hour lecture, I went over to Marie's place for pizza, some wine and international company. I didn't stay long, but had some good laughs with Marie, Lena and Bram; the atmosphere was good, the weather was ok (Marie has a roof terrace) and the conversations interesting. Probably the best way to get over a class as stomach punching as that one!
As for today, I just managed to get my first choice topic for my Bachelor paper: 'Jane Austen, critical debates', which I am very thrilled about. I logged on not a minute too early, because by the time I was enrolled all spaces were taken! Crazy system anyway...
Tomorrow, I will have to give on oral presentation on my Swift paper. Hopefully that works out as well. I will actually feel relieved when that's over!
' Professor, why didn't Leacock bring a middle class family into the story, in order to contrast their 'virtue' with the 'vice' of the idle rich?'
And Prof. O'Connor replied: 'Dear X (here he said the girl's name, he knows us all by name, unfortunately I can't remember hers), maybe there is no such thing as 'virtue'. Maybe Leacock didn't bring another class into the story because maybe, middle class members are just as corrupt, idle and vicious as the idle rich. I want each and every one of you to think about this. Look at yourselves, are you not part of 'the idle rich'? Are our politicians not corrupt? Is our system not characterised by inefficiency and an enormous waste of money and time?'
And all went silent... We all read the book and I think we all read it as a satire on the really well-off people, the ones who own yachts and summer houses, the ones who play golf and drive Bentley's, but I don't think any of us thought about their own 'class', none of us even considered looking at their own situation... At first there was a long silence and then someone just asked another question and the discussion went on, but as for me, I was really taken aback by what had just occured in the 405 classroom in Carr Hall.
After the 3-hour lecture, I went over to Marie's place for pizza, some wine and international company. I didn't stay long, but had some good laughs with Marie, Lena and Bram; the atmosphere was good, the weather was ok (Marie has a roof terrace) and the conversations interesting. Probably the best way to get over a class as stomach punching as that one!
As for today, I just managed to get my first choice topic for my Bachelor paper: 'Jane Austen, critical debates', which I am very thrilled about. I logged on not a minute too early, because by the time I was enrolled all spaces were taken! Crazy system anyway...
Tomorrow, I will have to give on oral presentation on my Swift paper. Hopefully that works out as well. I will actually feel relieved when that's over!